RCVS Council votes to extend temporary remote prescribing guidance with additional safeguards - Veterinary Practice
Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now


RCVS Council votes to extend temporary remote prescribing guidance with additional safeguards

Amended temporary guidance to be communicated to the profession as soon as possible

At its meeting on 8 October 2020, the Council of the RCVS voted to extend the College’s temporary guidance that currently allows veterinary surgeons to prescribe prescription-only veterinary medicines (POM-Vs) remotely, but, with effect from 1 November 2020, update it with some further safeguards concerning physical examination of animals and the availability of follow-up care.

RCVS Council originally introduced this temporary guidance in March, as a result of the government’s lockdown and social distancing restrictions, to ensure that animal health and welfare could be maintained without risking the health of veterinary teams or their clients. The guidance had been extended a number of times since, most recently at the end of September, to reflect the changing circumstances and government guidance surrounding the ongoing pandemic.

At the request of Council, the future of the temporary guidance was discussed at the October meeting and Council reviewed all of the evidence considered by the COVID-19 Taskforce. A motion was subsequently laid by Dr Jo Dyer and Dr Neil Smith which paid tribute to the ongoing work and commitment of the COVID-19 Taskforce and their “invaluable contribution“ in making “quick decisions in a rapidly-changing situation”, but cautioned against pre-empting the outcome of the College’s review of “under care” and out-of-hours emergency cover.

Whilst acknowledging that remote prescribing in certain circumstances should remain an option for veterinary surgeons, the motion stated that this now “should only be carried out by veterinary surgeons who can provide a 24/7 follow-up service involving physical examination, plus or minus further investigation, if required”.

It further set out that such a follow-up service “can be provided personally by the veterinary surgeon or practice, or by written agreement with a veterinary services provider which is local to the client (as with the current situation for 24/7 care provision)”.

In considering the motion, Council was also able to review the report of an RCVS-commissioned independent survey of veterinary practices into their experiences of remote consulting, together with feedback from a number of different veterinary service providers and other veterinary organisations.

After further discussion, Council voted to support the motion, with amended temporary guidance to be communicated to the profession as soon as possible and effective from 1 November 2020, to allow time for practices to make any necessary adaptations.

Council also decided that the temporary derogation from the usual requirement to conduct a physical examination before an animal is regarded as “under care” be reviewed as a standing item at each subsequent Standards Committee meeting, until the normal guidance provisions were fully restored.

Veterinary Practice

Veterinary Practice is an online knowledge and information hub for veterinary professionals across all specialties. It provides reliable, useful and interesting content, written by expert authors and covering small animal, large animal, equine and practice management sectors of the veterinary surgeon and nursing professions.

More from this author

Have you heard about our
IVP Membership?

A wide range of veterinary CPD and resources by leading veterinary professionals.

Stress-free CPD tracking and certification, you’ll wonder how you coped without it.

Discover more